The M3[D] construction

Let D be a bounded distributive lattice, and let M3 = {0, a, b, c, 1} be the five-element nondistributive modular lattice.
Let M3[D] denote the subposet of D3 consisting of all <x, y, z> satisfying x y = y z z x. We call such
a triple balanced. Then the following statements hold:

    1. M3[D] is a modular lattice.
    2. The subset M3 = {<0, 0, 0>, <1, 0, 0>, <0, 1, 0>, <0, 0, 1>, <1, 1,1>} of M3[D] is a sublattice of M3[D] and it is isomorphic to M3.
    3. The subposet  D = {<x, 0, 0>}{x in D} of M3[D] is isomorphic to D; we identify D with  D.
    4. M3 and D generate M3[D]
    5. Let θ  be a congruence relation of DD; then there is a unique congruence θ  of M3[D θ  restricted to ol D is θ ; therefore,  Con M3[D] Con D.

This was introduced in E. T. Schmidt, Zur Characterisierung der Kongruenzverbande der Verbande, Math. Csasopis 18 (1968), 3-20.

 In today's terminology, M3[D] is a congruence preserving extension of D. The  extension  M3[D]  is shown in Figure .


Figure

 You can see the case, where D is the three-element chain

The first important generalization of this construction was the Boolean triple construction of (G. Grätzer and F. Wehrung, Proper congruence-preserving extensions of lattices, Acta Math. Hungar. 85 (1999), 175-185) which is a special case of a more general lattice tensor product construction of G. Grätzer and F. Wehrung. These constructions play an important role by the congruence-preserving extensions.

Generalizations, related results:

R. W. Quackenbush,  Non-modular varieties of semimodular lattices with a spanning M3, Discrete Math. 53 (1985), 186-190

J. D, Farley,  Priestley powers  of lattices and their congruences: a problem of E. T. Schmidt, Acta  Sci. Math. 62 (1996), 3-45

February 2008