The M3[D]
construction Let D be a bounded
distributive lattice, and let M3 = {0, a, b, c, 1}
be the five-element nondistributive modular lattice. 1. M3[D] is a modular lattice.
Let M3[D] denote
the
subposet of D3 consisting of all <x, y, z>
satisfying x y
= y
z
= z
x.
We call such
a triple balanced. Then the following statements hold:
2.
The subset M3
= {<0, 0, 0>, <1, 0, 0>, <0, 1, 0>, <0, 0, 1>,
<1, 1,1>} of M3[D]
is a sublattice of M3[D]
and it is isomorphic to M3.
3.
The subposet D
= {<x, 0, 0>}{x in D} of
M3[D] is isomorphic
to
D; we identify D with D.
4.
M3
and D generate M3[D].
5.
Let θ be
a congruence relation of D = D; then there is a unique
congruence θ
of M3[D] θ
restricted to ol D is θ ; therefore, Con
M3[D]
Con D.
Figure
You can see the case, where D is the three-element chain
The
first important generalization of this construction was the Boolean
triple construction
of (G. Grätzer and F. Wehrung,
Proper congruence-preserving extensions of
lattices, Acta Math. Hungar. 85
(1999), 175-185) which is a special case of a more general lattice tensor product
construction
of G. Grätzer and F. Wehrung. These constructions
play an important role by the congruence-preserving extensions.
Generalizations, related results:
R. W. Quackenbush, Non-modular varieties of semimodular lattices with a spanning M3, Discrete Math. 53 (1985), 186-190
J. D, Farley, Priestley powers of lattices and their congruences: a problem of E. T. Schmidt, Acta Sci. Math. 62 (1996), 3-45
February 2008